Individual differences in native language attainment: A review article1

نویسنده

  • Ewa Dąbrowska
چکیده

This article reviews several recent studies suggesting that – contrary to a widespread belief – native speakers of the same language do not share the same mental grammar. The studies examined various aspects of linguistic knowledge, including inflectional morphology, passives, quantifiers, and more complex constructions with subordinate clauses. The findings suggest that in some cases, language learners attend to different cues in the input and end up with different grammars; in others, some speakers extract only fairly specific, ‘local’ generalizations which apply to particular subclasses of items while others acquire more abstract rules which apply ‘across the board’. At least some of these differences are education-related: more educated speakers appear to master more general rules, possibly as a result of more varied linguistic experience. 1 Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the Symposium on Cognition Applied: UsageBased Linguistics and Language Learning (University of Southern Denmark, Odense, August 2007) and the Conference on Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Changing Languages (Tartu, May 2008). 2 “... children in the same linguistic community all learn the same grammar.” (Crain and Lillo-Martin 1999: 9) “... children are exposed to different samples of utterances but converge on the same grammar.” (Seidenberg 1997: 1600) “Children of the same speech community reliably learn the same grammar.” (Nowak et al. 2001: 114) “The set of utterances to which any child acquiring a language is exposed is equally compatible with many distinct descriptions. And yet children converge to a remarkable degree on a common grammar, with agreement on indefinitely many sentences that are novel. Mainly for this reason, Chomsky proposed that the child brings prior biases to the task.” (Lidz and Williams in press: 1) As these quotations illustrate, many linguists believe that all learners attain more or less the same steady state at the end of the language acquisition process. While this view is most strongly associated with generativists, it is also widely accepted by linguists and cognitive scientists with other theoretical orientations (cf. the Seidenberg quote). It is, of course, well known that there are large individual differences in vocabulary size and knowledge of highly literary constructions. However, when it comes to basic grammar, all adult speakers of the same language are thought to share the same system: in fact, this claim is sometimes used as evidence for other, more controversial claims (e.g. the existence of an innate universal grammar, as in the

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Online Processing of English Wh-Dependencies by Iranian EFL Learners

To be able to reach the level of ultimate attainment in the second language, learners need to acquire not only the grammar of the L2 but also the language processing mechanisms involved in the comprehension of sentences in real time. Contrary to its importance, very little is known yet about online L2 processing. This study examines whether advanced Iranian learners of English reactivate disloc...

متن کامل

More Individual Differences in Language Attainment: How Much Do Adult Native Speakers of English Know about Passives and Quantifiers?

This paper provides experimental evidence suggesting that there are considerable differences in native language attainment, and that these are at least partially attributable to individual speakers’ experience. Experiment 1 tested high academic attainment (hereafter, HAA) and low academic attainment (LAA) participants' comprehension using a sentence-picture matching task. Test sentences compris...

متن کامل

Exploring Pragmalinguistic and Sociopragmatic Variability in Speech Act Production of L2 Learners and Native Speakers

The pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic aspects of language use vary across different situations, languages, and cultures. The separation of these two facets of language use can help to map out the socio-cultural norms and conventions as well as the linguistic forms and strategies that underlie the pragmatic performance of different language speakers in a variety of target language use situatio...

متن کامل

Three perspectives on non-uniform linguistic attainment

D^hrowska's target article comes at a time when the study of individual diflerences is a more prominent "in thing" than ever in both native and non-native language studies. For example, the cover of the most recent research report of the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics proclaims: "Individual differences are a hallmark of our language faculty," and an upcoming issue of Language Learni...

متن کامل

(Non)native Language Teachers’ Cognitions: Are They Dichotomous?

In view of native/nonnative language teacher dichotomy, different characteristics have been assigned to these 2 groups. The dichotomy has been the source of different actions and measures to clarify the positive and negative points of being (non)native teachers. In recent years, many researchers have revisited this dichotomy. The challenge to the dichotomy can be a source of motivation to explo...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008